Backdoor access means that tech companies would create a way for government authorities to bypass encryption, allowing them to access private communications for surveillance and investigation. Proponents argue that it helps law enforcement and intelligence agencies prevent terrorism and criminal activities by providing necessary access to information. Opponents argue that it compromises user privacy, weakens overall security, and could be exploited by malicious actors.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
How would you feel if your personal messages could be read by someone else, even if it was for national security?
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
What are your thoughts on sacrificing some privacy for the sake of potentially preventing crime or terrorism?
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
Is there a point where you believe national security measures can go too far in accessing personal information?
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
Can you think of a time when you would have wanted law enforcement to have more access to information to solve a crime?
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
How do you balance your right to privacy with the needs of the community for safety and security?
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
If given a choice, would you opt in or out of allowing surveillance access to your digital communications, and why?
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
Do you believe there's a way to provide security agencies the information they need without violating individual privacy?
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
Reflecting on historical abuses of power, how do you feel about giving authorities more access to private communications?
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
Would you trust your government with a 'key' to everyone's private messages, under strict regulations and oversight?
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
If you had to design a system, how would you ensure authorities could fight crime and terrorism without overstepping into unnecessary surveillance?
