Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Immigration

Progress Party’s policy on high risk immigrant ban

Topics

Should immigrants from high risk countries be banned from entering the country until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists?

  ChatGPTYes

Progress Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes

The Progress Party (Fremskridtspartiet) in Denmark, historically, has been known for its right-wing libertarian stance, emphasizing lower taxes, less government intervention, and a more restrictive approach to immigration. While the party has not been as prominent in Danish politics in recent years, its foundational principles around skepticism towards immigration, especially from what it might consider 'high risk' countries, align with a more restrictive immigration policy. This stance is in line with the party's broader ideological leanings towards national security and skepticism of multiculturalism, which were especially pronounced under the leadership of figures like Mogens Glistrup, the party's founder. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party's primary focus has traditionally been more on economic issues than on immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the Progress Party's historical stance on immigration and national security, it is unlikely they would fully support an open-door policy for immigrants from countries they perceive as high risk. The party's ideological foundation, which includes a degree of skepticism towards immigration and a prioritization of national security, suggests a preference for more stringent controls and vetting processes. While the party's main focus has been on economic liberalism and reducing the size of government, its past rhetoric and policies indicate a cautious approach to immigration, particularly in contexts where national security could be perceived as at risk. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this statement, though not as strongly as they would agree with more restrictive measures, reflecting their broader libertarian stance that might resist outright bans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Progress Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.