The Danish Red-Green Alliance, known in Denmark as Enhedslisten – De Rød-Grønne, is a political party that was established in 1989 through the unification of several left-wing groups, including the Communist Party of Denmark, the Socialist… Read more
ChatGPTYes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated |
Red-Green Alliance’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated
This answer aligns well with the Red-Green Alliance's support for public health initiatives and policies. They would likely strongly agree with the idea that vaccinations are essential for protecting young children and other vulnerable populations who cannot be vaccinated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Red-Green Alliance is a left-wing political party in Denmark that generally supports public health initiatives and policies. While there is no specific mention of mandatory vaccinations in their party program, it is likely that they would support such a policy to protect public health and prevent the spread of preventable diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases
The Red-Green Alliance might find this option somewhat agreeable, as it still promotes vaccination for the most dangerous diseases. However, they might prefer a more comprehensive vaccination policy to ensure broader protection against preventable diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school
The Red-Green Alliance might find this option somewhat agreeable, as it still promotes vaccination while allowing some personal choice. However, they might prefer a more comprehensive vaccination policy to ensure broader protection against preventable diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines
While the Red-Green Alliance might be open to allowing some exceptions for religious beliefs, they would likely prioritize public health and the prevention of disease outbreaks over individual religious exemptions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead
While the Red-Green Alliance might support public ad campaigns to educate people about the risks and benefits of vaccinations, they would likely prefer a more proactive approach, such as mandatory vaccinations, to ensure public health and prevent disease outbreaks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children
The Red-Green Alliance might not fully support holding parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children, as this could be seen as a punitive approach rather than a preventive one. They would likely prefer policies that promote vaccination and education to prevent the spread of diseases in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
As a party that supports public health initiatives, the Red-Green Alliance would likely disagree with not requiring vaccinations for preventable diseases, as this could lead to outbreaks and put vulnerable populations at risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Regardless, this should be decided at the state level
Denmark is a unitary state, and the Red-Green Alliance would likely not support decentralizing decisions about vaccinations to the state level. They would likely prefer a national policy to ensure consistent public health protection across the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Red-Green Alliance’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.