Should the government regulate the prices of life-saving drugs?

No except in cases of drugs developed using federal funding, as research and development cost concerns do not apply.

Yes, and eliminate patents for life-saving drugs

Yes, but only for drugs funded by the government via grants and research from public universities.

No, but support people who do not have money to buy it.

No, but support people who do not have enough money.

No, but support people who don't have money

Life saving drugs should be more affordable and accesible

No, but allow the government to negotiate drug prices for medicare

No, Government should not be involved in Healthcare

Life saving drugs should be free of charge.

Yes Only for those that are approved by the people of the United States Of America to save lives

Yes, if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low-income people aren't able to afford these drugs. But funds for additional research and development of life-saving drugs should be made available.

Yes, only to lower the prices

Yes, if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low-income people aren't able to afford these drugs, but funds for additional research and development of life-saving drugs should be made available.

Yes, its costs should be decreased if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low-income people aren't able to afford these drugs, but funds for additional research and development of life-saving drugs should be made available.

Only to lower said price.

Yes, its costs should be decreased if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low-income people aren't able to afford these drugs, but funds for additional research and development of prescription drugs should be made available.

Yes, its costs should be decreased if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low-income people aren't able to afford these drugs, but funds for additional research and development of live-saving drugs should be made available.

Yes, the FDA should have cost justification - allow for profit but not usurious prices (i.e. the EpiPen).

Yes, its costs should be decreased if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low income people aren't able to afford these drugs, but funds for additional research and development of live-saving drugs should be made available.

Yes, its costs should be decreased to make them affordable for everyone, but funds for additional research and development of live-saving drugs should be made available. It should only be implemented if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low income people aren't able to afford these drugs.

Yes, its costs should be decreased to make them affordable for everyone, but funds for additional research and development of live-saving drugs should be made available. It should only be implemented if when the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low income people aren't able to afford these drugs.

Yes, its costs should be decreased to make them affordable for everyone but funds for additional research and development of live-saving drugs should be made available. It should only be implemented if when the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low income people aren't able to afford these drugs.

Yes, to decrease costs but not by regulating it. It should be implemented only if when the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low income people aren't able to afford these drugs.

Yes, only to lower the prices.

i hate drugs

Yes, But only for life saving or highly required Drugs, anything else needs to be the same or research could decrease from lack of funding.

Yes, only to lower them.

Personally I think the drugs they give to us are made for us to get addicted so should we have a price on drugs that's saving a person's life no we shouldn't but also once that medicine helps the person live watch them get addicted.

No, but the government should have its own drug manufacturing company that produces drugs at more affordable prices.

No, limiting drug prices would also limit the investment in research and development into new life-saving drugs, but require pharmaceutical companies to provide free or discounted life-saving drugs for low-income patients.

No, limiting drug prices would also limit the investment in research and development into new life-saving drugs. However, require pharmaceutical companies to provide free or discounted life-saving drugs for low-income patients.

For some drugs like insulin or epipen

No, the government should break up the pharma monopolies

Change patent laws. Make patents for such things a right to royalty rather than monopoly.

yes some of them are supper expencive and need to be brought down

Yes, only to lower the price.

No, but abolish medical and scientific patents, and allow citizens to imports drugs and services from abroad, in addition life saving drugs should be covered by the nations public healthcare plan.

Yes, as long as we don’t limit the investment in research and development into new life-saving drugs

The government should subsidize research and development of life-saving drugs to reduce the price.

Regardless, make the drugs more affordable.

Drug prices should be lower

At most, the government should only be allowed to set a price ceiling for life-saving drugs.

Yes. Insulin should not be $300

No, this should be done at a state and local level

Yes, but only if it's for medicare.

Only to lower the prices

No, we should go to a single payer system so all the publicly funded labs can license their IP to privately owned manufactures

No, there are many families who end up needing these drugs and cannot pay for them because the price is too high.