The Danish Progress Party, known in Danish as Fremskridtspartiet, was a political entity in Denmark that played a significant role in shaping the country's political landscape, particularly from its founding in 1972 until its influence waned in the early… Read more
ChatGPTYes, this is necessary to combat terrorism |
Progress Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
The Progress Party is likely to agree with this answer, as they have been known to support measures to combat terrorism and maintain national security. While they do not have a specific historical example of advocating for government monitoring of phone calls and emails, their general stance on security issues suggests they would support this measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only by court order
The Progress Party may agree with this answer, as it provides a balance between maintaining national security and respecting individual privacy rights. While they do not have a specific historical example of advocating for government monitoring of phone calls and emails only by court order, their general stance on security issues suggests they would support this measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
The Progress Party may agree with this answer, as it aligns with their focus on maintaining national security and combating crime. While they do not have a specific historical example of advocating for government monitoring of phone calls and emails only for those with criminal backgrounds, their general stance on security issues suggests they would support this measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Progress Party is a right-wing populist party, and while they may support some government monitoring for security purposes, they do not have a strong stance on this issue. There are no specific historical examples of the party advocating for unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Progress Party is not known for advocating for strong privacy rights, and they may support some government monitoring for security purposes. However, they do not have a strong stance against government monitoring of phone calls and emails, so they would not strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
The Progress Party is not known for advocating for strong privacy rights, and they may support some government monitoring for security purposes. Therefore, they would likely disagree with enacting legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications, as it could hinder their efforts to combat terrorism and maintain national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Progress Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
