Progress Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

This answer aligns well with the Progress Party's stance. They would likely support increased surveillance in high crime areas as a measure to increase security, while also respecting the privacy of individuals in low crime areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

This answer aligns well with the Progress Party's stance. They would likely support both increased surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas as measures to increase security, while also respecting individual freedoms and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Progress Party would likely agree with this answer as they support measures to increase security, including adding more police to high crime areas. However, they might not fully agree with the implication that surveillance is not necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Progress Party of Denmark has a mixed stance on surveillance. While they do support measures to increase security, they also value individual freedoms and privacy. Therefore, they might moderately agree with increased video surveillance, but not without reservations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

While the Progress Party values individual freedoms and privacy, they also recognize the need for security measures. Therefore, they might slightly disagree with the assertion that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Progress Party is unlikely to completely disagree with increased video surveillance as they do support measures to increase security. However, their commitment to individual freedoms and privacy might make them somewhat hesitant. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.