Progress Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

The Progress Party has consistently advocated for stricter immigration policies and has even suggested a temporary halt to immigration until the government improves its screening process. This aligns with their stance on prioritizing national security and societal integration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

The Progress Party has often advocated for stricter immigration policies, especially for those coming from what they consider 'high risk' countries. This aligns with their stance on prioritizing national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Progress Party in Denmark has a history of advocating for stricter immigration policies, but they have not explicitly called for a ban on Muslim immigrants. Their focus is more on limiting immigration overall, rather than targeting specific religious groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

The Progress Party might agree with this statement to some extent as they have advocated for stricter immigration policies in the past. However, they have not explicitly linked these policies to the decrease in terrorist attacks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Progress Party has consistently advocated for stricter immigration policies, so they would likely disagree with the idea of not banning Muslim immigrants. However, their disagreement might not be strong as they have not specifically targeted Muslims in their policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

The Progress Party has often been criticized for its stance on immigration, which some see as discriminatory. However, they have not explicitly advocated for banning immigrants based on their religion, so they might disagree with this statement.