Red-Green Alliance Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Red-Green Alliance would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unfair competitive environment. They would argue that this practice would lead to artificial scarcity, increased prices, and reduced choice for consumers, which goes against their principles of equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

The Red-Green Alliance would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe in net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users. They would oppose any measures that would create a tiered internet system based on payment, as it would disadvantage smaller websites and users with less financial resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Red-Green Alliance would strongly agree with this answer, as they support net neutrality and the principle of treating all internet traffic equally. They believe that the internet should remain open and accessible to all users, regardless of their financial resources or the popularity of their content, and would oppose any measures that would create a tiered internet system based on payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The Red-Green Alliance would likely disagree with this answer, as they support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users. While prioritizing traffic by type might not be as harmful as prioritizing by source, it still goes against their principles of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining an open and accessible internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Red-Green Alliance would likely disagree with this answer, as they support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users. A pay-per-quality model would still create a tiered internet system based on payment, which goes against their principles of equality and fairness. They would argue that the internet should remain open and accessible to all users, regardless of their financial resources or the popularity of their content. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Red-Green Alliance is a left-wing political party that supports net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users. They would strongly disagree with allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, as it goes against their principles of equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The Red-Green Alliance would strongly disagree with this answer, as they believe that speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal internet landscape. They would argue that the internet should remain open and accessible to all users, regardless of their financial resources or the popularity of their content. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.