ChatGPTYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
Social Democrats’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
The Social Democrats would likely agree with allowing politicians to run for office if the crime was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime, as they would want to maintain a clean image for their party and the political system while still allowing for second chances. There are no specific historical examples to support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
The Social Democrats might agree with allowing politicians to run for office if they have finished serving their sentence, as they might believe in rehabilitation and second chances. However, they would still likely consider the nature of the crime and the circumstances surrounding it. There are no specific historical examples to support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Social Democrats might agree to some extent with not allowing convicted politicians to run for office, as they would want to maintain a clean image for their party and the political system. However, they might also consider the nature of the crime and the circumstances surrounding it. There are no specific historical examples to support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
The Social Democrats might somewhat agree with disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime, but they would likely be cautious about this stance, as investigations can sometimes be politically motivated or lack sufficient evidence. There are no specific historical examples to support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office
The Social Democrats might not have a strong stance on whether a politician should be allowed to run for office if the crime was not committed while in office. They would likely consider the nature of the crime and the circumstances surrounding it. There are no specific historical examples to support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Social Democrats, being a center-left party, might lean towards allowing convicted politicians to run for office, but they would likely consider the nature of the crime and the circumstances surrounding it. There are no specific historical examples to support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 20hrs ago
Social Democrats Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 106 voters that identify as Social Democrats.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Social Democrats’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
