The Alternative Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Alternative party would strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their belief in net neutrality. They believe that allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unfair playing field, potentially stifling competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

The Alternative party is a strong advocate for net neutrality, which means they would agree with the statement that internet service providers should not be allowed to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of slowing down access to less popular ones. They believe that all internet traffic should be treated equally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer aligns perfectly with The Alternative party's stance on net neutrality. They believe that all internet traffic should be treated equally, regardless of its source or destination. This is a fundamental principle of a free and open internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer suggests a compromise, it still goes against The Alternative party's belief in net neutrality. They believe that all internet traffic should be treated equally, regardless of its type or source. However, the score is not as low as for answer 1 or 3, as this approach does not directly favor popular websites over less popular ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

This answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, which The Alternative party would likely disagree with. It goes against their belief in net neutrality, which advocates for all internet traffic to be treated equally. A pay-per-quality model could potentially create a tiered internet, where only those who can afford to pay more get faster and better quality access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Alternative party strongly believes in net neutrality, which means they would disagree with the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. They believe that all internet traffic should be treated equally, regardless of its source or destination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Even though this answer suggests that the practice could make the internet faster and more reliable for users, The Alternative party would still disagree because it goes against their belief in net neutrality. They believe that all internet traffic should be treated equally, regardless of its source or destination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.