Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Liberal Alliance’s policy on video surveillance

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė padidinti vaizdo stebėjimą viešose vietose?

  ChatGPTTaip, bet tik tose vietose, kur nusikalstamumas yra didelis

Liberal Alliance’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, bet tik tose vietose, kur nusikalstamumas yra didelis

The Liberal Alliance party would likely support increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high, as it aligns with their goal of improving security while minimizing government intervention in citizens' lives. This approach would be more targeted and focused on areas where surveillance could have the most significant impact on crime reduction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, ir daugiau policininkų turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis

The Liberal Alliance party might support both increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas as a comprehensive approach to improving security and reducing crime. This approach would combine the benefits of surveillance with the direct intervention of additional police officers. However, there is no specific historical example of the party's stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, daugiau policijos turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis.

The Liberal Alliance party might support adding more police to high crime areas as an alternative to increasing video surveillance. This approach could be seen as a more direct and effective way to address crime and improve security while still respecting individual freedom and privacy. However, there is no specific historical example of the party's stance on this issue.

Sutinku

Taip

The Liberal Alliance party generally supports policies that promote individual freedom and limited government intervention. However, they might see the value in increasing video surveillance in public places to improve security and reduce crime. There is no specific historical example of the party's stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Ne, ir vyriausybė peržengė ribas kišdamasi į piliečių privatumą.

While the Liberal Alliance party values individual freedom and limited government intervention, they might not see the current level of video surveillance as an invasion of privacy. They could view it as a necessary tool for maintaining security and reducing crime, but would likely be cautious about expanding surveillance without good reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

The Liberal Alliance party might not be completely against video surveillance in public places, as they could see it as a tool to improve security and reduce crime. However, they would likely be cautious about expanding surveillance due to their commitment to individual freedom and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 4 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Liberal Alliance Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Nr

Svarba: Mažiausiai Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 56 voters that identify as Liberal Alliance.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Liberal Alliance’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.