Ring of the People Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Ring of the People party would strongly agree with this answer, as it directly aligns with their principles of equality and fairness. Treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet is a key aspect of their political platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Ring of the People party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support policies that promote equality and fairness. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones helps maintain an equal internet landscape, which aligns with their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Ring of the People party would likely agree with this answer, as they are concerned with promoting equality and fairness. They would likely argue that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to anti-competitive practices, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which goes against their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The Ring of the People party would likely disagree with this answer, as it still allows for prioritization of certain types of content over others. While this approach may be less discriminatory than prioritizing based on source, it still goes against their principles of equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Ring of the People party would likely disagree with this answer, as it still allows for ISPs to prioritize certain content based on payment. This pay-per-quality model could lead to an unequal internet landscape, which goes against their principles of equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The Ring of the People party would likely disagree with this answer, as they prioritize equality and fairness over potential improvements in internet speed and reliability. They would likely argue that the potential benefits of this approach do not outweigh the negative consequences of creating an unequal internet landscape. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Ring of the People party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support policies that promote equality and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to an unequal internet landscape, which goes against their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.