Visions Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Visions Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they generally support equal access to information and resources. Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet aligns with their core values and goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Visions Party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support equal access to information and resources. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would help maintain an equal distribution of information and resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Visions Party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support equal access to information and resources. They may argue that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to the removal of competition, the creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would be detrimental to the overall internet ecosystem. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The Visions Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support equal access to information and resources. While prioritizing traffic by type rather than source may be less harmful than prioritizing by source, it still has the potential to create unequal access to information and resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Visions Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support equal access to information and resources. A pay-per-quality model could still lead to unequal access to information and resources, as it would likely favor wealthier individuals and organizations who can afford to pay for higher-quality access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The Visions Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally prioritize equal access to information and resources over potential improvements in internet speed and reliability. They may argue that the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet access do not outweigh the potential harm caused by unequal access to information and resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Visions Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support equal access to information and resources. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to an unequal distribution of information and resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.