大麻党

Very strongly agree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

This statement aligns strongly with the Cannabis Party's stance on personal freedoms and privacy rights. They would likely argue that the government has already gone too far in invading the privacy of citizens, particularly in relation to drug laws and enforcement.

Strongly agree

不

The Cannabis Party is likely to agree with this statement as they tend to prioritize personal freedoms and privacy rights. They would likely argue that increased surveillance is a threat to these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Cannabis Party might agree with this statement to some extent as it suggests a more targeted approach to dealing with crime rather than broad surveillance. However, their primary focus is on drug policy reform, not law enforcement strategies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

While the Cannabis Party might see the logic in focusing surveillance in high crime areas, they would still likely be opposed to the overall increase in surveillance due to their stance on personal freedoms and privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

While the Cannabis Party might agree with the need for more police in high crime areas, they would likely disagree with the increase in surveillance. Their stance on personal freedoms and privacy rights would likely lead them to oppose this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Cannabis Party in Denmark is primarily focused on the legalization and regulation of cannabis. They are generally not in favor of increased surveillance as it can infringe on personal freedoms and privacy, which aligns with their broader stance on individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.