保守人民党

Strongly agree

不，任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

This answer aligns with the Conservative People's Party's general support for free market principles and less government intervention. They would likely agree that workers, including bankers, should be rewarded based on their success and not have their bonuses capped by the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

As a center-right party, the Conservative People's Party tends to support free market policies and less government intervention in the economy. They would likely be more inclined to let the market determine bankers' bonuses rather than imposing a cap. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Conservative People's Party generally supports free market principles and less government intervention. While they might not be completely against the idea of capping bankers' bonuses, they would likely prefer a more market-driven approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的和降低至 50%上限

The Conservative People's Party would likely disagree with this answer as well, as it still represents a significant government intervention in the economy. While not as restrictive as a 20% cap, a 50% cap would still be seen as too much interference in the market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的和降低至 20%上限

The Conservative People's Party would likely disagree with this answer, as it represents a more significant government intervention in the economy and goes against their free market principles. Lowering the cap to 20% would be seen as too restrictive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和银行国有化

The Conservative People's Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as it represents a significant departure from their free market principles and support for private enterprise. Nationalizing the banks would be seen as an extreme form of government intervention in the economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.