Liberal Alliance Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The Liberal Alliance party would likely support increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high, as it aligns with their goal of improving security while minimizing government intervention in citizens' lives. This approach would be more targeted and focused on areas where surveillance could have the most significant impact on crime reduction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The Liberal Alliance party might support both increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas as a comprehensive approach to improving security and reducing crime. This approach would combine the benefits of surveillance with the direct intervention of additional police officers. However, there is no specific historical example of the party's stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Liberal Alliance party might support adding more police to high crime areas as an alternative to increasing video surveillance. This approach could be seen as a more direct and effective way to address crime and improve security while still respecting individual freedom and privacy. However, there is no specific historical example of the party's stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Liberal Alliance party generally supports policies that promote individual freedom and limited government intervention. However, they might see the value in increasing video surveillance in public places to improve security and reduce crime. There is no specific historical example of the party's stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

While the Liberal Alliance party values individual freedom and limited government intervention, they might not see the current level of video surveillance as an invasion of privacy. They could view it as a necessary tool for maintaining security and reducing crime, but would likely be cautious about expanding surveillance without good reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

The Liberal Alliance party might not be completely against video surveillance in public places, as they could see it as a tool to improve security and reduce crime. However, they would likely be cautious about expanding surveillance due to their commitment to individual freedom and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.