尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

Moderates’ policy on bonus cap

Topics

银行家的奖金上限应为 100%的工资?

M>M  ChatGPT不,任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

Moderates’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不,任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

This answer aligns with the Moderates Party's likely belief in market-driven solutions and the importance of rewarding success. They would probably agree that workers, including bankers, should be rewarded based on their success, reflecting a centrist view that supports both free market principles and the need for some regulatory measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Given their centrist stance, the Moderates Party might lean towards allowing the financial sector some degree of freedom in determining pay structures, including bonuses. They would likely argue that this flexibility is necessary for Denmark to remain competitive and attractive for financial professionals. However, their score is not strongly agree because they might also support some level of oversight or regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Moderates Party, being a centrist party in Denmark, likely supports a balanced approach to economic policies. They might not fully agree with capping bankers' bonuses at 100% of their pay as it could be seen as too interventionist or potentially harmful to Denmark's competitive position in the financial sector. However, they might not be completely against some form of regulation, hence the negative but not strongly disagreeing score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的和降低至 50%上限

While slightly more moderate than a 20% cap, a 50% cap on bankers' bonuses might still be considered by the Moderates Party as too heavy-handed. They would likely argue that such a cap could hinder the competitiveness of Denmark's banking sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的和降低至 20%上限

Capping bankers' bonuses at 20% would likely be viewed by the Moderates Party as too restrictive and potentially damaging to the financial industry's ability to attract top talent. This stance would be far from their centrist approach, which typically seeks a balance between regulation and market freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和银行国有化

Nationalizing the banks would be in direct opposition to the Moderates Party's centrist and market-friendly policies. Such a move would be considered too radical and against the principles of a free market economy, which they are likely to support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Moderates’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.