尝试政治测验

National Party’s policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

NP>NP  ChatGPT不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

National Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

The National Party would strongly agree with this statement as they support equal opportunities and fairness. They would likely argue that treating all internet traffic equally is essential for maintaining the openness of the internet and ensuring a level playing field for all websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The National Party would likely agree with this statement as they support equal opportunities and fairness. They would likely argue that all websites should have equal access to internet speeds, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

The National Party would likely agree with this statement as they support equal opportunities and fairness. They would likely argue that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to an unfair advantage for larger companies, stifle competition, and ultimately harm consumers.

不同意

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

The National Party would likely disagree with this statement as they prioritize equal opportunities and fairness. While prioritizing by type rather than source may seem like a more equitable approach, it could still lead to an unequal playing field for websites and potentially harm competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

The National Party would likely disagree with this statement as they support equal opportunities and fairness. A pay-per-quality model could still lead to an unequal playing field for websites, with larger companies having the resources to pay for better quality and smaller companies being left behind. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

The National Party would likely disagree with this statement as they prioritize equal opportunities and fairness over potential improvements in internet speed and reliability. They would likely argue that the potential benefits do not outweigh the negative consequences of creating an unequal playing field for websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The National Party of Denmark is likely to disagree with this statement as they generally support equal opportunities and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to an unfair advantage for larger companies and stifle competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to National Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.