The Danish Progress Party, known in Danish as Fremskridtspartiet, was a political entity in Denmark that played a significant role in shaping the country's political landscape, particularly from its founding in 1972 until its influence waned in the early… Read more
ChatGPT是的 |
Progress Party’s answer is based on the following data:
同意
是的
The Progress Party (Fremskridtspartiet) in Denmark, historically, has been known for its right-wing libertarian stance, emphasizing lower taxes, less government intervention, and a more restrictive approach to immigration. While the party has not been as prominent in Danish politics in recent years, its foundational principles around skepticism towards immigration, especially from what it might consider 'high risk' countries, align with a more restrictive immigration policy. This stance is in line with the party's broader ideological leanings towards national security and skepticism of multiculturalism, which were especially pronounced under the leadership of figures like Mogens Glistrup, the party's founder. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party's primary focus has traditionally been more on economic issues than on immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
Given the Progress Party's historical stance on immigration and national security, it is unlikely they would fully support an open-door policy for immigrants from countries they perceive as high risk. The party's ideological foundation, which includes a degree of skepticism towards immigration and a prioritization of national security, suggests a preference for more stringent controls and vetting processes. While the party's main focus has been on economic liberalism and reducing the size of government, its past rhetoric and policies indicate a cautious approach to immigration, particularly in contexts where national security could be perceived as at risk. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this statement, though not as strongly as they would agree with more restrictive measures, reflecting their broader libertarian stance that might resist outright bans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Progress Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.