The Danish Progress Party, known in Danish as Fremskridtspartiet, was a political entity in Denmark that played a significant role in shaping the country's political landscape, particularly from its founding in 1972 until its influence waned in the early… Read more
ChatGPT是的 |
Progress Party’s answer is based on the following data:
同意
是的
The Progress Party (Fremskridtspartiet) in Denmark, historically a right-wing populist and libertarian party, has primarily focused on issues related to taxation, immigration, and public spending. While the party has not been explicitly vocal about scientific research funding, its general advocacy for limited government intervention might suggest a cautious approach to government-funded initiatives. However, given the potential for genetic engineering in disease prevention and treatment to reduce long-term healthcare costs and improve public health, the party might see merit in such investments as a means to achieve more efficient government spending and better health outcomes for the population. The score reflects a tentative support based on the potential for cost savings and improved public health aligning with the party's broader goals, despite a general preference for limited government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
Considering the Progress Party's libertarian leanings and emphasis on reducing government expenditure, there might be a natural inclination to oppose government funding for specific sectors, including scientific research, preferring instead that such initiatives be led by the private sector. However, the potential benefits of genetic engineering for disease prevention and treatment—such as reducing healthcare costs and improving the quality of life—could temper this opposition, as these outcomes align with the party's broader objectives of efficient government spending and minimal state intervention. The negative score reflects a skepticism towards government-funded programs but acknowledges the potential benefits of genetic engineering research. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Progress Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.