The Danish Red-Green Alliance, known in Denmark as Enhedslisten – De Rød-Grønne, is a political party that was established in 1989 through the unification of several left-wing groups, including the Communist Party of Denmark, the Socialist… Read more
ChatGPT不 |
Red-Green Alliance’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
不
The Red-Green Alliance would likely agree with the idea that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws. They have supported policies that promote social justice and equality, and they would likely view hate speech as harmful to these goals. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party may have some concerns about the potential for government overreach in defining and regulating hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
The Red-Green Alliance would likely agree with the idea of increasing penalties for hate speech, as they support policies that promote social justice and equality. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party may have some concerns about the potential for government overreach in defining and regulating hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
The Red-Green Alliance might somewhat agree with this answer, as it acknowledges the potential harm of hate speech that threatens violence. However, they might still be concerned about the broader impact of hate speech on social cohesion and equality, even if it does not directly threaten violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
The Red-Green Alliance would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support government intervention in promoting social justice and equality. While they might have concerns about potential government overreach, they would likely view some level of regulation on hate speech as necessary to protect marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的
The Red-Green Alliance is a left-wing political party in Denmark that generally supports policies promoting social justice and equality. They are likely to disagree with the idea of protecting hate speech under freedom of speech laws, as hate speech can contribute to discrimination and social divisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
The Red-Green Alliance would strongly disagree with this answer, as they believe in the importance of freedom of speech beyond just criticizing the government. They would likely view this position as overly restrictive and contrary to their values of social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Red-Green Alliance’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.