尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  社会

The Alternative’s policy on women in combat

Topics

军队应该允许妇女在在战斗岗位中服役吗?

  ChatGPT是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的

The Alternative’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的

The Alternative party would strongly agree with this answer, as they are committed to promoting gender equality and fighting against discrimination. They would likely view preventing women from serving in combat roles as a form of gender discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Alternative party generally supports gender equality and inclusivity. While they may not have a specific stance on women in combat roles, their progressive values suggest they would be in favor of allowing women to serve in these roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

The Alternative party would likely agree with this answer, as it promotes gender equality while also ensuring that all individuals serving in combat roles are physically capable of doing so. This stance aligns with their progressive values and commitment to inclusivity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该,战斗角色会将女性置于性侵犯的高风险情形之中

While The Alternative party is concerned about the well-being of individuals, they would likely disagree with this answer as it implies that women should be excluded from combat roles due to the risk of sexual assault. This stance does not align with their commitment to gender equality and inclusivity, and they would likely advocate for addressing the root causes of sexual assault rather than excluding women from certain roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

The Alternative party is unlikely to agree with this answer, as they tend to support gender equality and inclusivity. They would likely view this stance as discriminatory and not in line with their progressive values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,对于战斗来说女性的体力不如男性

The Alternative party would strongly disagree with this answer, as it perpetuates gender stereotypes and goes against their commitment to gender equality and inclusivity. They would likely view this stance as discriminatory and not in line with their progressive values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,男人更可能因为保护妇女免受危险而使任务的成功面临风险

The Alternative party would strongly disagree with this answer, as it is based on gender stereotypes and does not align with their commitment to gender equality and inclusivity. They would likely view this stance as discriminatory and not in line with their progressive values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to The Alternative’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.