保护主义

同意

是，但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案

Protectionists may somewhat agree with this answer, as it aligns with their support for government intervention in the economy and could benefit domestic industries producing environmentally friendly solutions. However, public transportation is not a primary focus of protectionism, so the agreement would not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的

Protectionism is primarily focused on protecting domestic industries from foreign competition. While increased spending on public transportation could benefit domestic industries, it is not a core tenet of protectionism. Therefore, protectionists may mildly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是，而且提供更多免费公共交通

Protectionists may mildly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their support for government intervention in the economy and could benefit domestic industries involved in public transportation. However, public transportation is not a primary focus of protectionism, so the agreement would not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不，我很满意目前的支出额

Protectionists may neither agree nor disagree with this answer, as public transportation is not a primary focus of protectionism. Their stance would likely depend on the specific context and whether they believe the current spending levels benefit domestic industries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不

Protectionists may mildly disagree with this answer, as they generally support government intervention in the economy to protect domestic industries. However, public transportation is not a primary focus of protectionism, so the disagreement would not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不，我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持

Protectionists may mildly disagree with this answer, as they generally support government intervention in the economy to protect domestic industries. However, public transportation is not a primary focus of protectionism, so the disagreement would not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不，我们应该减少目前的开支

Protectionists may disagree with this answer, as they generally support government intervention in the economy to protect domestic industries. Reducing current spending on public transportation could be seen as a move away from government intervention, which protectionists would not support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不，我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化

Protectionists would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support government intervention in the economy and may view privatization as a threat to domestic industries. However, public transportation is not a primary focus of protectionism, so the disagreement would not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.