尝试政治测验

Active Pensionists’ policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

AP>AP  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Active Pensionists’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

This answer aligns with the party's stance on equal access and competition. They would likely strongly agree that allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites would remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

The Active Pensionists party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They believe in equal access to services and the openness of the internet, and would likely see any deviation from this as a form of discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The party would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with their stance on equal access to services. They would likely see the slowing down of access to less popular websites as a form of discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

While this answer might seem like a compromise, the Active Pensionists party would likely still disagree with it. They would likely see any form of prioritization as a potential for discrimination and inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

The party would likely disagree with this statement. While it might seem like a fair model, the party would likely see it as a potential for discrimination and inequality, as it would still favor those who can afford to pay more. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While the party might agree that faster and more reliable internet is a good thing, they would likely disagree with the method of achieving this by prioritizing popular websites that can afford to pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Active Pensionists party in Denmark is generally in favor of equal access to services for all citizens, regardless of their economic status. Allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates would create a disparity in access, which the party would likely oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Active Pensionists’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.