Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
M>M Personal answer不 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
M>M Personal answerIts important to take this more case by case. For certain materials and certain uses varying taxes or regulations should be applied. |
社会 › LGBT收养权
M>M Personal answerIf a child has a chance to go to a loving household that meets legal requirements it should be ILLEGAL to deny that to the child because of your own religious or political leanings, that is child abuse. |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
M>M Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
M>M Personal answerYes, but with a focus on moving towards more environmentally friendly and less psychologically stressful solutions |
移民 › 双重国籍
M>M Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 精神健康
M>M Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
M>M Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › European Commission
M>M Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
M>M Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
M>M Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
M>M Personal answer是的 |
社会 › 安乐死
M>M Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
国内政策 › 视频监控
M>M Personal answerYes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
M>M Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
M>M Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
M>M Personal answerΌχι, αλλά να επιτρέπονται δωρεές από συνδικάτα |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
M>M Personal answerYes, but not if their crime was politically motivated |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
M>M Personal answerYes, and they should be placed there by the government to carry out government interests |
医保 › 安全港
M>M Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
M>M Personal answerYes, but not like the US model which is a failure, European nations should continue to slowly expand and reform their overlapping unions through diplomacy between nations so that we can slowly erode meaningless distinctions while keeping meaningful ones which is something defined by nations themselves |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
M>M Personal answerDefine 'authoritarian'. Authoritarianism is simply an ideology of a powerful state; there is nothing wrong with that in itself. Sanction despotic or tyrannical member-states, yes, but not simply authoritarian. |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
M>M Personal answerActions that have shown to be statistically beneficial to increase rehabilitation rates should be favored |
经济 › VAT Rates
M>M Personal answerIncrease, to help sustain the economy |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
M>M Personal answer不 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
M>M Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 关税
M>M Personal answerNo, but increase tariffs on environmentally unfriendly products. |
外交政策 › Backstop
M>M Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
M>M Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
M>M Personal answerYes, I support the idea but I would not campaign for it |
国内政策 › 任期限制
M>M Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Animal Testing
M>M Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Israel Boycott
M>M Personal answer不 |
教育 › School Truancy
M>M Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
M>M Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
外交政策 › EU Army
M>M Personal answer不 |
经济 › 公司税
M>M Personal answerRaise, but ideally instead you have a VAT and a low corporate tax because it would be more friendly to small businesses and generate lots of tax |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
M>M Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
M>M Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
M>M Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Migrant Children
M>M Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
M>M Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Hate Speech
M>M Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
M>M Personal answer不 |
经济 › 跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴
M>M Personal answerYes, but with more transparency |
社会 › Gender Transition
M>M Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
M>M Personal answer是的 |
经济 › State Ownership
M>M Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 23 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.