Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 死刑
KC>KC Personal answerNo, it's expensive, authoritarian, and doesn't offer much value |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
KC>KC Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
KC>KC Personal answerYes, private companies shouldn't be able to profit off of healthcare, but it should be a syndicated consumer cooperative system where people vote on a basic plan and personalize it as they want to (whicn can include paying more for better benefits) |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
KC>KC Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
移民 › 双重国籍
KC>KC Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
医保 › 精神健康
KC>KC Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
KC>KC Personal answerYes, anyone who pays taxes, lives, or works here should be able to vote. But, if it is just for work or temporary citizenship, it should only be for local elections. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
KC>KC Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
社会 › 安乐死
KC>KC Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
KC>KC Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
KC>KC Personal answerNo, and we shouldn't have private internet service providers. This industry should be syndicated and available for free for everyone. |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
KC>KC Personal answer是的,而且他们在任的每一年要求一个公开审计 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
KC>KC Personal answerNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
KC>KC Personal answerYes, but not by the government. This should be done by an independent fact-checking cooperative. |
移民 › 技术移民
KC>KC Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
移民 › 公民考试
KC>KC Personal answerYes, and current citizens should be tested as well. |
经济 › 最低工资
KC>KC Personal answerYes, but allow state and municipalities to tweak it to fit their area and local economy. Also, it should automatically adjust with inflation. |
医保 › 安全港
KC>KC Personal answer应该,这对于降低用药过量死亡率是必要的 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
KC>KC Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
经济 › 全民基本收入
KC>KC Personal answerYes, but everyone should be required to be working or in school to qualify. |
国内政策 › 任期限制
KC>KC Personal answer应该,任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败 |
环境 › Animal Testing
KC>KC Personal answer不 |
教育 › School Truancy
KC>KC Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
KC>KC Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
KC>KC Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
KC>KC Personal answerNo, but political advertising should be strictly monitored by an independent fact-checking company (cooperatively owned by the workers and not privately or government controlled). |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
KC>KC Personal answer是的 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
KC>KC Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Hate Speech
KC>KC Personal answerNo, and increase penalties for hate speech |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
KC>KC Personal answerYes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
KC>KC Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
社会 › Gender Transition
KC>KC Personal answerYes, if any treatment is deemed medical, it should be available to a person, regardless of age. |
医保 › World Health Organization
KC>KC Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
KC>KC Personal answerYes, but it should be syndicated into cooperatives. |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
KC>KC Personal answerOnly if necessary for certain industries. Labor relations should be managed by syndicates for each industry and private business should be abolished. |
经济 › State Ownership
KC>KC Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.