Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 堕胎
Personal answerPro-Life, Life beginning at the uterine wall when cell growth starts. So (Plan B) the morning after pill is ideal for promoting. The Government should not fund any abortion or activism (of any kind). |
环境 › 环境规制
Personal answerNo, Provinces and Regions, Even Municipalities, would be best dealing with this issue. Different places, different problems. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
Personal answerYes, if there is shown to be a solid extended family with good opposite sex active role models. |
科学 › 核能
Personal answerYes, but the communities involved should have final say. |
移民 › 双重国籍
Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
Personal answer不 |
经济 › 政府支出
Personal answerYes, most of Federal Government spending is for Civil Servants to redistribute funds to other high level civil servants, trickling it down to nothing and using strings attached to control local and provincial Government affairs. |
社会 › 安乐死
Personal answerNot assisted, if they want to do it themselves, up to them. Leave some cleanup money behind. |
医保 › 大麻
Personal answerI believe in ending all federal drug laws not related to trade. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
环境 › 转基因食品
Personal answerYes, fully labelled like advertising and in controlled growing so there is no accidental cross breading on the lands of others. |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
Personal answerNo, unless they are a sitting incumbent. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
国内政策 › 举报人保护
Personal answerGive them "Time Served," under a No Recrimination Act, as long as information proves true and leads to convictions. Anyone falsely accused has rights.. Don't treat them like heroes, unless they had nothing to do with what they witnessed. |
总统大选 › 有犯罪前科的政客
Personal answerYes, if they did their full time. Not if paroled or conditionally released. |
总统大选 › 最低投票年龄
Personal answerNo, I am starting to side with raising it. |
移民 › 技术移民
Personal answerMaintain, unless there is a huge need for specific jobs to be filled. |
经济 › 国内工作
Personal answerRestructure Revenue Sourcing, we need to eliminate all taxes on Individuals. Keep tariffs on foreign goods, and a royalty to sales of Goods, Services, Franchise Fees, and Stock Sales by non-Sole Owned Companies. Even look at crowd funding on a voluntary level.` |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
Personal answerAll Federal Laws On Drugs as well as Regulations should be ended unless pertaining to Trade. |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
Personal answerYes, unless they didn't finish their full term in prison but through Conditional and Parole release. |
环境 › 水力压裂法
Personal answerYes, but the say should be the communities effected by the industries. |
国内政策 › 政府监视
Personal answerNo, and all Espionage (CSIS, CSE, et al...) should be banned. |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
Personal answerNo, it's dishonorable to hide behind a woman. |
医保 › 安全港
Personal answerNo, it's a dangerous mixed message and highly controlling. |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
Personal answerYes, pardon non-violent criminals for those crimes alone fully (not if they have others attached that are violent). |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
Personal answerThe Government shouldn't fund sports events. Private Leagues, Player Associations and Sports organizations should be allowed to set their own rules and contracts in this manner. Individual Sportsmen/women as well. |
经济 › 税
Personal answerNo, we need to eliminate all taxes on Individuals. Keep tariffs on foreign goods, and a royalty to sales of Goods, Services, Franchise Fees, and Stock Sales by non-Sole Owned Companies. |
环境 › Animal Testing
Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
经济 › 工会
Personal answerCentrally controlled monopolistic unions have hurt. Old fashioned guilds with apprenticeships and a contracted minimum, but not maximum wage should be fine. Civil Service unions do hurt things. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
Personal answerDecrease, end all foreign military activity abroad. |
外交政策 › Israel Boycott
Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
经济 › 经济刺激
Personal answerNo, the Government should just get out of the way of the private sector. In most cases. |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
Personal answer1 year health screening and training, to see if they like it. No combat or tours. |
经济 › 奖金上限
Personal answerNo, but no one should bail them out or offer corporate welfare to make it easy to help pay them more. |
经济 › 公司税
Personal answerRestructure Revenue Sourcing, we need to eliminate all taxes on Individuals. Keep tariffs on foreign goods, and a royalty to sales of Goods, Services, Franchise Fees, and Stock Sales by non-Sole Owned Companies. Even look at crowd funding on a voluntary level. |
经济 › 社会福利
Personal answerIt's a provincial issue. On principle, maybe there should be a limitation on the amount of years, perhaps an end to future generations and immigrants using it. Also separating Disability to the Medical System, not conflating it with welfare. |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
Personal answerOnly Google has the problem of running a search and platform, the rest do not. |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
Personal answerOnly in freer part of the world. Not communist or fascist states. |
社会 › Hate Speech
Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
Personal answerNo, the Federal Government shouldn't fund any of it. Personally: Eliminate the Patrol, Beat, Vice, and Car 87/Wellness Check cops. |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
Personal answer不 |
社会 › Gender Transition
Personal answerNo, surgery, hormones or puberty blocker. If you let your kid boy wear a dress or something and identify, fine. All have a right to mature naturally. |
医保 › World Health Organization
Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.